Tax on gratuity, provident fund and pension

Retirement and severance payments are where employees most often overpay or underpay tax, because the rules hinge on a single word — "approved" — that most people never think to check until the money is due. Gratuity, provident fund and pension each have their own treatment in the Income Tax Ordinance, and each splits sharply depending on whether the underlying fund is approved or recognised. This guide sets out the three, so an employee can check the position before a lump sum lands.

Why "approved" decides everything

The Ordinance gives concessional treatment to retirement benefits only where the fund meets defined conditions and has been formally approved or recognised — by the tax authority for gratuity and pension funds, and as a recognised provident fund under the relevant schedule. The logic is that approved funds are properly constituted, ring-fenced and administered, so the concession is not open to abuse. The practical consequence for an employee is stark: the same rupee of gratuity can be largely exempt or largely taxable depending on a status they had no part in setting. So the first question at any payout is always: is this fund approved?

Gratuity

Gratuity is a lump sum paid on the end of employment, usually tied to length of service. The treatment splits three ways:

• Approved gratuity fund: exempt up to the ceiling the Ordinance specifies, with the excess taxable.
• Gratuity under a scheme approved by the tax authority but paid other than from an approved fund: a defined exemption applies, generally lower than the approved-fund ceiling.
• Unapproved arrangement: a small exemption at most, with the balance taxed as salary.

Because the ceilings are set in the Ordinance and adjusted over time, confirm the current limit before applying it. The gratuity, once the exempt portion is stripped out, is taxed with salary under the ordinary salary tax slabs, so the timing of receipt can matter for which year's slabs apply.

Approved and unapproved funds, side by side

Every row favours the approved fund, and the only cost of getting there is the fourth row's paperwork. An employer running an informal gratuity promise has taken on the liability without any of the treatment.

Provident fund

Approval is what the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 turns on here. Approved gratuity funds, provident funds and pension schemes are dealt with in the Sixth Schedule to the Ordinance, which sets the conditions for approval and the treatment that follows, and employer contributions are deductible under section 20 only where the fund qualifies. An arrangement that has never been approved is not a lesser version of the same thing — it is outside the regime entirely.

Provident funds divide into recognised and unrecognised:

• Recognised provident fund: the employer's contribution and the interest credited are treated concessionally, and the accumulated balance is generally exempt on payment subject to conditions. The employee's own contribution may also attract a tax credit while employed.
• Unrecognised fund: parts of the balance — notably the employer's contribution and interest on it — become taxable on payment.

The distinction again turns on formal recognition. An employee should ask the employer or fund trustees whether the fund is recognised, because it changes whether the final balance arrives largely intact or with a tax charge attached.

Pension

A pension received by an individual on retirement is generally exempt from tax, and the commuted portion — the lump sum taken in place of part of the ongoing pension — from an approved scheme is exempt subject to conditions. Complications arise where a person receives more than one pension, or draws a pension while taking up fresh employment, in which cases the exemption may be restricted. The commonest planning point is the commutation decision, which has both a cash-flow and a tax dimension worth modelling before it is made.

Records and reconciliation

Keep the fund rules, the approval or recognition evidence and the payout computation with the tax file. These payments are large and land in a single year, so they show up prominently in the wealth statement reconciliation — a Rs several-million inflow needs a clear, evidenced explanation. Employers administering these funds should also align the payout treatment with their payroll tax obligations, and employees should read across to salary tax mechanics for how the taxable portion is actually deducted.

Timing and the year of receipt

Because these benefits usually arrive as a single large sum in one tax year, the year of receipt can materially affect the tax on any portion that is not exempt. A taxable slice of gratuity stacked on top of a final year's salary may fall in a higher slab than the same slice would if received in a year with lower other income. Where an employee has any choice over timing — for instance, over when a commutation is taken — it is worth running the numbers for the alternatives rather than defaulting to the earliest date. The exempt portions are unaffected by timing, but the taxable remainder is not, and a short delay can occasionally reduce the marginal rate that applies to it.

Sources

This guide is written against the official and clearly labelled professional references below. Rates, thresholds and portal procedures change between reviews, so open the primary source before relying on a figure.

• Income Tax Ordinance 2001, updated (FBR)
• Income Tax Basics (FBR)
• File an Income Tax Return (FBR)

Questions people also ask