Tax filing season is open. ● Secure your ATL status before the deadline — open your Chartered Books →
← All tax guidesBusiness tax

Feasibility study and business plan for financing in Pakistan

CA Finalist, ACCA FinalistEditorial team: Chartered Advisory Team of Chartered Accountants
Business tax guide: Feasibility study and business plan for Pakistani finance
Quick answer: A feasibility study and business plan for financing in Pakistan should establish market demand, the operating plan, and — most importantly to a lender — realistic financial projections showing the business can service the financing. Banks and investors test the assumptions behind the projections, so those assumptions must be defensible.

When a Pakistani business approaches a bank or investor for financing, the feasibility study and business plan are the documents that decide the outcome — and most are rejected not because the idea is bad but because the numbers are not credible. A lender is not buying the vision; it is assessing whether the business can repay. Understanding what actually gets read, and tested, lets an owner produce a plan that persuades. This guide sets out what financiers expect and where plans most often fail.

What the document is for

A feasibility study asks whether a venture is viable — whether there is demand, whether it can be operated, and whether it makes financial sense — and is typically prepared before committing capital. A business plan sets out how the business will be run and is the document taken to a financier. For financing purposes the two merge: the feasibility analysis becomes the justification for the plan's projections. Either way, the reader's question is the same — can this business generate enough cash to survive and, if borrowing, to service the debt. Everything in the document should serve answering that question.

The projections carry the weight

A lender reads the market and operations sections for context, but its attention is on the financial projections, and above all on cash flow. The decisive test is whether projected cash flow covers the financing repayments with a comfortable margin, because a lender is repaid out of cash, not out of accounting profit or optimism. A plan should therefore show clearly: the expected revenue build-up, the full cost base, the resulting profit, and — most importantly — the cash flow and how it services the financing period by period. A working knowledge of working capital matters here, because a growing business can be profitable and still run short of cash, which is exactly the risk a lender is guarding against.

Running a company or an AOP?

We handle the computation, the minimum-tax comparison, statutory accounts and the annual filings together.

Avail our corporate tax services

Assumptions are what get tested

The most important thing to understand is that a lender does not take projections at face value — it tests the assumptions beneath them. Any spreadsheet can be made to show a profit with generous enough inputs: aggressive sales growth, understated costs, no allowance for delays or bad debts. An experienced lender knows this and probes accordingly: Is the sales forecast grounded in something real — comparable businesses, signed intent, a defensible market share — or is it a hopeful straight line? Are the costs complete, including the ones owners forget? What happens to repayment capacity if revenue is 20% lower or arrives six months later? Projections built on stated, evidenced, conservative assumptions survive this scrutiny; projections resting on optimism do not.

Worked point. Two plans project the same Rs 30 million revenue in year two. One simply grows year one by a round percentage with no basis. The other derives it from a stated number of customers, an average transaction value benchmarked to comparable businesses, and a conversion assumption the owner can defend — and then shows what repayment looks like if only 70% of that is achieved. A lender can assess the second and cannot trust the first, even though the headline number is identical.

Consistency with the real numbers

A final, often-overlooked point: the plan's figures should be consistent with the business's actual financial statements and tax filings. A plan that shows profits the tax returns do not reflect immediately raises the question of which set of numbers is true — and undermines credibility with a lender who may see both. Aligning the plan with properly prepared financial statements, and grounding any valuation used in it in the methods covered under business valuation and the discipline of financial modelling, produces a coherent, believable package. Credibility, not ambition, is what unlocks financing.

The non-financial sections still matter

None of this means the narrative can be neglected. A lender that is persuaded by the numbers still wants to see that the people behind the plan understand their market, their competition and their operations — because credible numbers depend on a credible operating story. The management section matters: financiers back people, and evidence that the team has the experience to execute reduces perceived risk. The market section has to show genuine demand rather than assert it. And the operating plan must be realistic about what it takes to deliver the projected sales — the staff, premises, suppliers and capacity. The financial projections are where a lender concentrates, but they are believed only when the surrounding plan makes them plausible. A strong plan is one where the story and the numbers reinforce each other, each making the other more credible.

Confirm before you rely on this. Lender and investor requirements vary and change. This guide describes general expectations only; consult the specific financier and a qualified adviser when preparing a feasibility study or business plan for financing.

Sources

This guide is written against the official and clearly labelled professional references below. Rates, thresholds and portal procedures change between reviews, so open the primary source before relying on a figure.

Questions people also ask

What does a bank actually look at in a business plan?

Above all, whether the business can repay. A bank reads the market and operating sections for context, but it focuses on the financial projections and, specifically, on whether projected cash flow covers the loan repayments with a margin. It also tests the assumptions behind those projections. A plan with an attractive narrative but weak or unrealistic numbers, or projections that assume implausible growth, does not persuade a lender.

What is the difference between a feasibility study and a business plan?

A feasibility study asks whether a proposed venture is viable — is there demand, can it be operated, does it make financial sense — and is usually done before committing. A business plan sets out how an intended business will be run and is the document taken to a lender or investor. They overlap heavily, and for financing purposes the feasibility analysis is often folded into the business plan's justification of the numbers.

Why do lenders test the assumptions rather than the projections?

Because projections are only as good as the assumptions beneath them. Any spreadsheet can show a profit if the assumptions are generous enough — high sales, low costs, no delays. A lender assesses risk by probing those assumptions: is the sales forecast grounded, are the costs complete, what happens if revenue is lower or slower than assumed. Defensible, evidenced assumptions are what make projections credible.

Scope note: General educational information for Pakistan, not a legal opinion or a substitute for advice based on your documents. Law, notifications, portal procedures and individual facts can change the result.
Need this applied to your own documents?

Send the tax year and the transaction or filing involved, and we will tell you what is actually required.

Talk to Chartered Advisory Open the tax calculators